Type to jump to a section.
GB Law Firm
(516) 444-1000Two drivers, two honest accounts of the same traffic light, and a claim decided by what can actually be proved
An intersection crash is the one where both drivers genuinely believe they had the light. Side impacts happen inside a second, from an angle neither driver was watching, and the two accounts that follow are usually honest and completely irreconcilable.
That makes these evidence cases rather than argument cases. Nobody wins a disputed intersection claim by insisting more firmly than the other side. It is won with signal timing, sight lines, the geometry of the damage, independent witnesses, and footage from a camera nobody thought about at the time.
It is also the configuration where the injury is worst relative to the speed involved. A side impact puts the occupant closer to the point of collision than any other crash type, with less vehicle structure in between to absorb it.
An intersection case is decided by what was recorded rather than by what was remembered, and most of what was recorded has a shelf life measured in days.
New York's rules govern who was entitled to proceed, and a violation of them is strong evidence of negligence. Establishing which rule applied means establishing what actually controlled the intersection — a signal, a sign, or nothing — rather than what either driver assumed controlled it.
Where a vehicle was struck, how far it travelled afterwards and where the debris came to rest narrow the possibilities considerably. Damage geometry frequently contradicts one of the two accounts, and it does so without anyone having to be called a liar.
A person with no stake in the outcome is the most valuable thing at the scene and the hardest thing to find afterwards. A name and a number taken in the first hour is worth more than weeks of investigation later.
New York reduces a recovery by the claimant's share of the blame rather than barring it. In a genuinely disputed intersection case the carrier's realistic aim is often a percentage rather than a denial, and the percentage is very much worth arguing about.
The vocabulary of a disputed New York intersection claim. In this crash type the words about evidence decide the words about money.
The rules determining which vehicle was entitled to proceed. They turn on what controlled the intersection and on where each vehicle was when the other entered it, which is a question of fact rather than of recollection.
New York's rule that a claimant's own share of fault reduces the recovery proportionally instead of ending the claim. It is why a disputed intersection case is usually worth pursuing even when the other side has something to point at.
The module most modern vehicles carry, retaining speed, braking and restraint information from the seconds around an impact. It is read with the right equipment and the right permission, and it is lost the moment the vehicle is salvaged.
The loss or destruction of evidence by someone who ought to have preserved it. Where a notice to preserve has been sent and ignored, a court has remedies available — which is the reason the notice goes out early rather than eventually.
New York permits a claim for pain and suffering only where the injury falls into one of the categories set by statute. Side-impact injuries frequently meet it, but meeting it still has to be established rather than assumed.
Your own insurer pays initial medical bills and part of any lost earnings regardless of who caused the crash. The application generally has to reach them within 30 days of the collision, and it is a separate track from any claim against the other driver.
If the other driver's version of the light differs from yours, the evidence that settles it is disappearing now rather than later. Call (516) 444-1000.
A disputed intersection case is usually won or lost in the first fortnight, by whoever thought to preserve something.
An independent witness is the single most useful thing available at the scene and effectively unobtainable a week later. A name and a phone number is enough.
The signals, the signs, the sight lines and anything blocking them — a parked truck, an overgrown hedge, a skip. The road as it was that day is the context every later argument depends on.
Shops, petrol stations, buses, doorbells and dashcams all record intersections, and almost all of them overwrite on a short cycle. Footage requested in week one is often available; in week four it is usually gone.
The damage geometry is the physical record of how the impact happened, and newer vehicles also hold recorded data from the seconds before it. Both go when the car does.
Side-impact injuries commonly present the following day. A gap between the crash and the first treatment note is the most useful fact the defence has.
This is with your own insurer and it is unaffected by who caused the crash. A late application gets denied on the deadline alone, whatever the merits.
Call GB Law Firm at (516) 444-1000 for a free, confidential consultation. There is no obligation and no fee unless we win.
A disputed intersection case rewards whoever moved first. The preservation notices, the camera canvass and the witness contact all have to happen while the evidence still exists, and that work is done here in the opening weeks rather than once a carrier has denied the claim.
Our attorneys are admitted to practice in New York state and federal courts. Where the evidence genuinely cuts both ways you will be told so, along with what a realistic share of fault does to the value of your claim.
Free case review, and no fee unless we win. Call (516) 444-1000.
The case moves to whatever is not somebody's memory. Signal timing for that intersection, the geometry of the damage, where each vehicle ended up, independent witnesses and any camera that covered the junction. In most disputed cases at least one of those is decisive, and the work is getting to it before it disappears.
No. Witnesses help but they are not the only evidence. The physical record of the collision, the vehicles' own data and the layout of the junction all speak to what happened, and a nearby camera nobody noticed at the time is found more often than people expect.
The report is an officer's opinion formed quickly, usually without any of the evidence a claim is later built on. It is influential and it is not binding. Reports are frequently contradicted by the physical evidence, and where they are, that is what matters.
New York reduces the recovery by your share rather than ending the claim. Being found twenty per cent responsible reduces what you receive by twenty per cent. Carriers use this to discount aggressively, which is exactly why the percentage is worth contesting.
Quickly, and usually in writing. Most systems overwrite within days or weeks and no business is obliged to keep anything without being asked. A preservation request sent early is often the difference between having the crash on video and arguing about it.
Yes, and promptly. Side impacts transmit force to the occupant with very little structure in between, and the injuries frequently present a day or two later. An early examination protects both your health and the record.
Your own no-fault coverage does, regardless of fault and regardless of whose light it was. It runs on its own track and its own deadline — generally 30 days from the crash to get the application in.
Longer than an undisputed one, because liability has to be established as well as injury. Cases where the evidence resolves the dispute early can move quickly; those where it does not may need to be put into suit.
Most cases settle. Every file here is prepared as though it will not, because a carrier's willingness to improve an offer responds directly to how ready the other side is to try it.
The consultation is free and the case is handled on a contingency basis — no fee unless we win. If there is no recovery there is no fee, and the arrangement is set out in writing before anything begins.